fbpx

Up coming, we calculated the possibility organization ranging from this type of details and you may sociocultural facts, because of the performing Chisquared screening

Up coming, we calculated the possibility organization ranging from this type of details and you may sociocultural facts, because of the performing Chisquared screening

To compare all of our 2nd theory, we basic recoded, each of the things that toward status measure, the fresh part of solutions you to definitely reveal in the event the husbands have less, equal or more score, specifically, condition, with hypogamy, and therefore husbands provides lower updates than spouses, homogamy, definition equal updates, and hypergamy, meaning husbands which have higher standing than wives. Towards possible relationship out of nation, analyses was indeed tall when you look at the knowledge (X 2 =eleven.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you may monetary feeling out-of a possible split up (X 2 =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Study indicated that, getting Language players, there is certainly far more training hypogamy, whereas getting Dominican members there is certainly a whole lot more degree homogamy. About the economic circumstances if there is separation and divorce, while there is a whole lot more homogamy having Language people, there is a great deal more hypergamy for Dominicans (find Figure 1).

With previous marriages or otherwise not was not associated in order to differences in position. Concerning prospective connection between status and you can ages hitched, significant connections was indeed found in health (X 2 =fourteen.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and even though to own lovers y exists (forty.4%, each), for lovers y exists (43.4%). In other words, with the class with increased decades partnered, husbands provides lower health status. With college students away from previous failed marriages and having people away from newest wedding didn’t somewhat apply to status.

When you look at the share, the fresh analyses regarding the second theory revealed that in comparison to our very own standard, the most significant function related to help you standing ‘s the nation.

Univariate screening revealed tall differences in foundation step one (F=5

To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and coffee meets bagel inloggen hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).

Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.

In the end, hypogamy products during the Spain obtained somewhat below hypogamy products from inside the Dominican Republic

Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.

Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).

FUTURS APPRENTIS
ACCOMPAGNÉS AU TRAVERS
DE 11 ÉTAPES EN FRANCE
2x plus qu’en 2019 !


INTERVENANT

8,5/10
« Cet événement est très intéressant pour les jeunes à la recherche de pistes et de méthodes. »


JEUNES

7,7/10
« J’ai pu faire examiner et avoir des retours sur mon CV, ce qui m’a été très utile ! »